Sunday, December 7, 2014

Fragment after Sappho


Fragment after Sappho
 

Love’s fortunes swing without warning.
I can’t balance as they sway.
From desire to disaster,
it’s so hard to stop halfway.


[Author's note: This week I'm up against one of the most stressful deadlines of my life to date. I'd appreciate your good thoughts.]

Sunday, November 23, 2014

Scheduling

Apologies. Too busy with my day job to post this week. Try back next week.

Monday, November 10, 2014

The Sky over Saint Peter's



Sorry for the late post. I'm grading the second midterm this week, on top of at least fifteen other enormous deadlines. Please enjoy this poem that I wrote when I was living in Rome. 

The Sky over Saint Peter's




No rain, no clouds, no sadness yet
just blue on blue on top of blue
so blue it hurts my eyes.
As not-so-early morning traffic
swirls around the fountain
and dies into the night.

Or pre-dawn glowing gold-on-blue
over the buildingtops too greet
the day that’s paused in coming.
I skirt the fountain, yet alone,
can’t quite define the color
suspended in the air.

Stars are hard to find in Rome.
From my terazza, certainly
a dark spot in the city,
I count no more than twenty.
So frightened by the big-town bustle
they slink into the corners
and wink out as I chase them.

But molten gold glows slowly, surely
filtered through the leaves of trees
as light begins to fade.
Behind me blue melts into pink
as one lone airplane traces high an arc;

you’d think it was a star.

Sunday, November 2, 2014

Divine Government



      Greece is famous as the cradle of democracy, but we should all remember that, during the golden age of classical Greek democracy, the system was more or less restricted to Athens, and moreover was seen by the other Greek city-states (generally ruled by old-fashioned monarchies or oligarchies) as a bizarre fringe movement that dangerously placed untrained civilians in positions that really ought to be occupied by experienced professionals. It was a direct democracy, which meant that it did involve putting randomly-chosen inexperienced laypeople in decision-making positions, which certainly invites certain difficulties, although their lack of experience and connections was supposed to be a benefit (a safeguard against cronyism). We should also remember that Athenian democracy was effectively crushed when Philip of Macedon conquered all the Greek city-states (followed by some Hellenistic tyrants until all of Greece was absorbed into the Roman empire) so the heyday of Athenian democracy really wasn’t very long--only a few centuries.
      Still, Athenian democracy had its selling points. It was an experimental system in the Greek world, certainly innovative against a backdrop of oligarchies and monarchies. And there was definitely no precedent for democracy in myth, no illustration of the gods buying into Athenian political procedures. If you want to hear about the government of the gods, go check Hesiod’s Theogony. It’s just pages and pages of one dynast overthrowing another. Ouranos seizes power as soon as there’s a population of gods to hold power over. Ouranos’ son Cronos overthrows Ouranos. Cronos tries to eat his children to prevent himself from being likewise overthrown, but Zeus is hidden away and overthrows Cronos (via castration). Zeus holds autocratic power and prevents any of his children from becoming powerful enough to overthrow him. It is a despotic monarchy, and Zeus has his lightning bolts to destroy anyone who challenges his authority.
      The US is not a despotic monarchy, and in fact on Tuesday we have the opportunity to go out and vote for who we want to be in charge of certain powers and decisions. If you live in the US, I would strongly encourage you to read up on the elections under contention and candidates available in your area, and vote. Historically, not many people have had the opportunity to choose who rules over them, so I encourage you to take advantage of this anomaly.

Sunday, October 26, 2014

Another Warrior Woman



      I’m not really the type to dress up for Halloween, but if I were, I would be inclined to go as Camilla. She’s always been one of my idols. She’s a warrior maiden/huntress on the model of Athena, Artemis, Atalanta, Callisto, Penthesileia, and so many others: a young woman who rejects conventional feminine activities and clothing and adopts masculine habits, while simultaneously refusing any romantic entanglements. It’s the sort of persona that sounded very daring to me when I was a young tomboy, a persona that I myself aspired to have. These days I tend to approach these warrior maidens through a more critical gender-theory lens, asking why it’s always necessary in myth for women who engage in conventionally masculine pursuits to forego a romantic life, why the male authors who record these stories are apparently so threatened by the idea of a physically competent woman who also have satisfying sexual lives (but I’ll spare you a tirade on the pervasive association of femininity with weakness).
      Still, for the casual reader, or the young student of myth, these women can be encouraging personalities, evidence that--although we hear plenty about the oppression of women and the dominance of men in antiquity--not all women were stuck at home spinning while the men were out hunting. Some of the women refused to be constrained by gender expectations, and Camilla is a great example. She’s a distinguished character in Vergil’s Aeneid (though not really mentioned in any other classical works of literature), in which Vergil praises her as a competent leader, a miraculously fast runner, the darling of Diana, and a fearless warrior. Vergil has a reputation for not being attracted to women, but reading his description of Camilla, there is a definite aura of impressiveness around this character, if not attractiveness. Camilla is a character who really shines out in spite of the setbacks imposed by her gender.
      She has a fatal flaw, in spite of all these admirable qualities: she gets greedy on the battlefield. In a time when looting the bodies of fallen adversaries was a primary source of income for soldiers, it’s understandable that Camilla marks out an enemy with particularly expensive armor and wants to kill the guy wearing it to get it for herself. She is distracted enough by the ostentatious armor that another enemy is able to kill her. Diana mourns Camilla’s death and regrets that it was dictated by fate; as much as Diana favored Camilla, there was no way for her to prevent her from dying on the battlefield. Although her death is depicted as tragic, the flaw serves to humanize the character, who otherwise appears intimidating, almost superhuman in aspect.
      This is where I start considering my costume, and wondering how to make it recognizable. The Aeneid doesn’t really give much indication of what she looked like (although Dryden’s translation of the Aeneid casts her as a beautiful girl, for no reason that’s obvious in the original). Vergil describes her in equipment typical of any other military leader on the field--red cape, bow and quiver, etc.--but otherwise doesn’t describe her physically. He only says that everyone was in awe of her and impressed by her appearance. In Mandelbaum’s translation of the Aeneid, book 7 is introduced with a haunting illustration of Camilla by Barry Moser, which shows her as a grim and arresting woman in a black cloak and a mail shirt. Her face is pale (against a black background) and her eyes are shaded, giving her face a skull-like look. Decidedly not pretty, but certainly a military leader who could inspire awe.
      Unfortunately, the Aeneid seems to be our only source for stories about Camilla (aside from one sentence in an obscure author named Hyginus). I say unfortunately because she’s one of the characters in the Aeneid who is thought to be adopted from ancient Italian folklore. The idea is that when Vergil went to write an epic about a military conflict involving many pre-Roman populations of Italy, he researched a bunch of pre-Roman folklore and incorporated the most impressive heroes (including Camilla) into his epic. The ultimate victors of the Aeneid would be the proto-Romans, Aeneas and his cronies, so this composition process contains an implicit disparagement of the inferior Italian heroes. This process serves to illustrate how great Aeneas is--Camilla, after all, is killed when fighting Aeneas’ army. Presumably, however, in the earlier stories that Vergil researched, the pre-Roman characters were consistently cast as heroes, without suffering any humiliating process of subjugation to the proto-Roman invaders. In the Aeneid we only see Camilla when she’s fighting Aeneas, except for one charming story about how, when she was an infant, her father tied her to a spear and threw her across a river to save her from a rampaging horde. I imagine there were other unique stories about Camilla, and I’m very sorry that they are now lost.

Sunday, October 19, 2014

I seriously doubt that the ancient Korinna was ever stuck at home on weekends grading midterms

Sorry, no update this week due to midterms. This week I'm the avenging angel of academic honesty, expelling plagiarism from wherever it lurks; next week I'll be the humble writer again.